| |
Government leaders
have spoken and pledged, once again, to move with all
deliberate speed-a clich, that also observes it's own
anniversary! Reports of progress and the lack of progress
also makes the scorecard at best a "C" on a scale of A to D,
with A being the top score. Masking this performance are two
extremes.
On the positive extreme, financial pledges and those secured
get an "A": Sri Lanka's estimated need was on the order of
United States Dollars 2.2 Billion (Rs. 220 Billion); the
amount pledged and secured is in fact more, US Dollars 3.0
Billion (Rs.300 Billion); and for Indonesia the need was US
Dollars 5.0 Billion. Funds pledged were US$ 6.5 Billion, of
which US $ 4.5 Billion is secured and available.
These funds include
multilateral and bilateral lenders, international
organisations and non-governmental organizations. No
long-term reconstruction effort in living memory has had
such a show of tangible support.
On the negative extreme the "D" (fail mark) goes to Housing.
More than three-fourths of the houses destroyed by the
Tsunami in Indonesia and Sri Lanka are yet to be fully
rebuilt.
The permanent housing
need in Ache and Nias in Indonesia is 140,000; in Sri Lanka
the need has been put at 103,000. It does not take a
statistician to visit the affected areas and note that many
of the tens of thousands who lost their homes still live in
camps.
The A and B grades go
to the local communities, NGOs-both local and foreign-and
faith organisations who rose to the demand for relief and
reconstruction. Even in the face of unfair criticism, the
NGO's have especially shown their courage and sincerity to
help the affected.
As critics remain in denial, this assessment may be
contentious as would the statistics referred to. But that is
neither here nor there. What is real is that there remains a
huge humanitarian and reconstruction crisis that should hold
the leaderships of the affected countries accountable.
It was heartening that President Mahinda Rajapakse pledged
to give the reconstruction effort the highest priority and
his personal attention. In other words, what this should
mean is that Government will hold itself accountable to
fully deliver the results before stock is taken on December
26, 2006.
This will require holding the feet of Ministers, officials
and organisations to the fire. No excuses will be
entertained. The New Year's Resolution should be "Deliver or
Depart" (to paraphrase the Motto of Royal College, Disce aut
Discede - Learn or Depart).
While the reconstruction of houses, schools, health centres,
community centres and business premises are surely on the
blueprints of action, the psychological footprint of
disasters is much bigger and deeper than the physical
imprint.
As President Bill Clinton put it on his recent visit to Sri
Lanka "there is a lot of emotional damage not easily
visible. I notice the sadness in their eyes"... just as in
the story of the widow that I recount in this column.
An expert in this
area, Sri Lankan Dr. David Ratnavale, says " unhealed mental
and psychological wounds fester, cause disability and
behavioral disturbances. Unresolved, it eats into the soul
of the community and may spread to sour the nation".
Dr. Ratnavale is well regarded for his expertise in
emotional and psychosocial dimensions of wars and disasters.
He has been actively engaged both in Sri Lanka and in the
United States to muster global support in this field.
Given the interest that this aspect of societal trauma has
generated, Sri Lanka could well champion, with international
support, the establishment of a Global Centre for Trauma
Response, that will bring together all international and
non-governmental expertise, and offer to house it in the
country.
Whether it is unmanaged water resources that can inundate
the worlds deltas, clouds of toxic emissions that float
across everyone's sky, one infected bird's flight path that
could cause a pandemic far and wide, there is a need to be
ready to address the "softer" aspects of disaster management
that affect the human mind. This Centre can be a focal point
and work in tandem with organizations such as the WHO.
********
On a lighter note, while on the subject of New Year
Resolutions, excessive food and lack of exercise can also
have a Tsunami-like effect on one's figure.
According to Dr. Michael O'Shea of the American College of
Sports Medicine, walking just 11 miles a week can keep you
from gaining fat-including visceral fat, the harmful type
that wraps around your organs, increases your waist size and
is associated with diabetes, heart disease and obesity. Just
30 minutes of moderate exercise six days a week is equal to
walking 11 miles.
Onward and forward!
|
|