| |
tsunami
reconstruction and rehabilitation with assurances of
funding. The funds available to IDEAS was hardly sufficient
to embark on such a programme. It is this spontaneous
goodwill and trust demonstrated by friends of IDEAS both
local and living abroad that encouraged IDEAS to start a
project in a tsunami hit area.
Lalit Godamunne supported by his Council members Shakuntala
Kuruppu, K. Gunaratnam, Ronni Weerakoon, Manel Abeysekera,
Prof. K.K.Y. Perera, Nanada Abeywickrema among others
decided thereafter to throw in their lot to tsunami
reconstruction and rehabilitation in addition to their
regular programmes. To the flow of funds from both local and
abroad must be added the free and voluntary support in time
and energy thrown in by architects lawyers and young
persons. Notably architect Chandra Gunewardene, Mahima
Wijesinghe a young executive at Hatton National Bank, Dilip
Jayawickrema a young entrepreneur and Anoja Seneviratne,
fired by their desire to do their bit for our people.
With the outpouring of enormous goodwill and supported by
this highly dedicated team of volunteers IDEAS decided to
formulate an approach to tackling a difficult task. A two
step plan was adopted. In the 1st stage, depending of fund
availability, a housing programme was formulated where 10
houses would be built. In stage two, a livelihood programme
very much on the lines of entrepreneur development would be
introduced. Initially to those participating in the housing
programme, and there-after spread to the rest of the village
depending on availability of funds as we progress. In
formulating its approach it was realized any intervention
must be with the total commitment and involvement of those
who were to benefit from such interventions.
IDEAS was not inclined to give hand outs or, in the case of
housing, build houses and present them to tsunami victims.
It had to be a joint effort with the major responsibility
for field organization, site preparation and construction
resting with the ultimate house owner. IDEAS would provide
the funds with an upper limit in instalments as construction
progressed. In addition, they would make available technical
support by way of architectural expertise and site advice
and monitor progress on a weekly basis in order to ensure
that cash requirements were met without delay as work
progressed. They would also use the weekly visits to obtain
information to report to our various friends of how their
money was being spent.
IDEAS management says
the challenge was to motivate and excite the beneficiaries
to commit themselves and take responsibility to the task of
building their own house. This meant to a population
devastated by the tsunami and left despondent, depressed and
hopeless to pull themselves together and start rebuilding
their shattered lives again. It is here the real commitment
of our young volunteers came to play. Their enthusiasm was
infectious and spread to the beneficiary participants. Soon
each builder had mobilized his family both immediate and
extended to make a joint effort.
Where carpenters and masons were required, the village found
their own at reduced rates. Backed by the trust placed in
them by giving each individual house owner cash
installements to purchase their required building material,
a level of confidence was soon built up, which we believe is
the key to the speed and efficiency with which each
beneficiary built his/her own house.
|
|
|