Plea to adopt Buddhist economics
PEOPLES' INTEREST: Sri Lanka's Buddhist economists say that the
cure for worldwide ills like poverty, inequality, insecurity and
violence lies in abandoning Western economic theories and models and
adopting Buddhist economics - economic principles enunciated by
Gautama Buddha, more than 2500 years ago.
The Buddha proposed that the pursuit, accumulation and use of
wealth be guided not only by self-interest but also by social
responsibility and compassion for the less fortunate and the less
endowed.
If this dictum is followed, the world will not be torn by the
horrible conflicts and tensions that it is today.
Fantastic strides in technology, mass production of an array of
goods and faster communications have not made the world a better
place to live.
These advances have only increased economic, social and political
disparities; poverty, national and international instability; armed
conflicts; terrorism and counter terrorism; and a sense of fear and
insecurity.
To fight pervasive fear and insecurity, elaborate and expensive
security systems and deterrents are put in place.
Defence budgets have soared even in the poorest countries.
It is in the light of these developments that Prof JW
Wickramasinghe, of the University of Sri Jayawardenepura in Sri
Lanka, has made a strong plea for the adoption of Buddhist economic
principles, which stress compassion, altruistic sharing, and a
social, as opposed to a purely individual-driven approach.
Grim picture
Buddhist economics replaces "self-interest" by "peoples'
interest" as the driving force or rationale of economic activity.
In his work Buddhist Theory of Development Economics published by
the Buddhist Cultural Centre, Dehiwela, Sri Lanka in 2002,
Wickramasinghe paints a grim picture of the present state of the
world.
He then contrasts the prescriptions of the traditional Western
economists with those of the Buddha as contained in His numerous "Suttas".
Quoting the Human Development Report of 1998, He says that 75 per
cent of the world's population lives in the developing countries,
but they enjoy only 20 per cent of the world's total output.
Fifteen per cent of the world's population, living in the
industrialised countries, enjoys 70 per cent of the global income.
The infant mortality rate in the developing countries is seven
times that in the developed countries.
In 1996, the value of exports of all developing countries
amounted to US$ 26 billion, which was only 10 per cent of UK's
exports.
The developing countries had been losing up to $700 billion in
annual export earnings as a result of the trade barriers maintained
by the industrialised countries.
"Had the poorest countries been able to maintain their share of
the world market at the mid-1980s level, their average per capita
incomes would be $32 a year higher, a significant increase over
today's figure of $228 a year," Wickramasinghe notes.
"The export earnings of developing countries could rise by $127
billion a year if developed countries opened their markets to
textile and clothing imports."
"In 1998 alone, the total agricultural support in the
industrialised countries amounted to $353 billion, more than triple
the value of official development assistance," he points out.
Poverty and inequality have only been increasing with economic
growth. In other words, economic growth has not led to economic
development.
Again quoting the Human Development Report of 1998,
Wickramasinghe says that the ratio of the income of the top 20 per
cent to the poorest 20 per cent was 30 to 1 in 1960.But by 1994, it
had gone up to a startling 78 to 1.
In 1982, the developing countries owed $647.2 billion to the
developed countries. But by 1993, it had jumped to $1162 billion.
The Net External Debt, as a percentage of the GDP, had risen from
37.1 per cent in 1982 to 43.6 per cent in 1993.
The total number of people below the poverty line (earning less
that $1 per day) increased from 1195 million in 1987 to 1300 million
in 1993.
In 1993, more than 160 million children in the world were
moderately or severely under nourished. Half a million women in the
developing countries died each year during child birth.
And to contain the intense competition and tension in the world,
created by Western economic theories and policies, countries have
been spending enormous amounts on defence.
In 1995, global defence spending stood at $ 800 billion, of which
the poverty stricken South Asian countries accounted for $15
billion, says Wickramasinghe.
Disparities in Sri Lanka
Disparities have been increasing in Sri Lanka, an avowedly
Buddhist and democratic country.
Using the Consumer Finance and Socio-Economic Survey data,
Wickramasinghe points out that while in 1973, the lowest income
recipient decile got 1.8 per cent of the total, it steadily fell to
0.40 per cent in 1985-86.
On the other hand, the highest income receiving decile, which got
29.98 per cent in 1973, secured 49.30 per cent in 1985-86.
Individual orientation at fault
The root cause of all this is the basic precept of Western
economic science, which is that the ultimate objective of all
economic activity is maximisation of the satisfaction of the
individual.
Economists like Adam Smith believed that self-centered pursuit of
economic activity would lead to perfect competition, and this would
eventually level society.
But this has not happened, says Wickramasinghe.
Change of heart needed
What one sees is the very opposite. The development of capitalism
and globalisation has only resulted in the widening of disparities.
This has been due to the almost complete disregard for social
welfare, equality and the common good. Modern states have used
instruments like taxation, welfare measures and affirmative action
to narrow the disparities.
But these have not been very effective, except in a few
Scandinavian countries.
What is needed, according to Wickramasinghe, is not only the
replacement of the "self-centered" approach by a "people-friendly"
approach but a change of heart, that is, change at the individual
level.
Individuals have to internalise the "people-friendly" approach.
Only then will the new system work smoothly and last long.
This calls for a deep study of Buddhism and the adoption of its
basic principles.
Buddha's prescriptions
In contrast to Adam Smith's contentions, the Buddha says in the "Kosambiya
Sutta" that when a person consumes wealth only by himself without
sharing with others, he generates social unrest through jealousy and
ill will. Unrest manifests itself in stealing and civil commotion.
While Western economics is based on greed, an insatiable appetite
for wealth and generation of wealth, the Buddha's economics rested
on production and acquisition of wealth without a trace of greed.
Greed to him was the root cause of inequality and subjection, and
the consequent unrest, destruction and radical change.
The Buddha was acutely aware of the power of greed and
Wickramasinghe quotes Him as saying in the "Rajja Sutta" that "even
if the Himalayan mountain is transformed into a mass of gold, it
would not be sufficient to satisfy the craving of a human being!"
The Buddha foresaw the consequences of greed-driven economics in
the " Chakkavatti Sihanada Sutta". He decried craving in the "Ratthapala
Sutta". The Buddha wanted people to produce wealth and consume it in
the right way in the "Rasiya Sutta".
He said that people should ask themselves the following
questions: "Was the wealth accumulated in the right, ethical way?
Was unfair means used? Whether consumption of it will deprive others
of consumption? Whether one is developing a needless attachment to
the article of consumption?
Meaningful charity
Distribution of wealth in the form of donation and other kinds of
sharing is the cornerstone of Buddhist economics.
Wickramasinghe quotes the "Samyuktta Nikaya, Sedaka Suttas" to
say that protection of others is the protection of oneself, since it
obviates the need for measures to protect one's wealth and person.
"Apart from the mental satisfaction one derives from a donation,
it reduces the cost of enjoying wealth," he observes.
The Buddha laid out four principles for the use of wealth:
1. To make one's mother and father, children and wife, servants
and workmen, and friends and comrades, happy and cheerful.
2. To make oneself secure from misfortunes.
3. To make offerings to relatives, guests, the ancestors and
deities.
4. To give gifts to ascetics and Brahmins.
|